Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Who should represent Huntingdon? Not Djanogly!

With the General Election called, the question that each Huntingdon constituency elector should ask themselves is: Who do I want to represent me in Parliament? Now I'm a bit of a right winger. I don't like Brown and Labour. I want rid of this rotten government. What I cannot do is bring myself to vote for Jonathan Djanogly as the person whom I want to represent this constituency in Parliament. 

Why do I feel this way?

Because Djanogly should be held to account by the electors of the Huntingdon constituency. Djanogly is quite happy to call for others to be transparent (example here), but when it comes to himself these rules seem to change with transparency becoming opaque. What do I mean by opaque? Well, I feel Djanogly tells us the information he allows us to know. I give a couple of examples below:

Where does Djanogly live? - He and his family do live in the constituency - at the weekend. They also live in London in an exclusive part of Westminster where his children go to school. His family lives in and around London. For much of the time, Djanogly worked as a Partner in SJ Berwin LLP. He and his wife, Rebecca, donated a seat at The Hampstead Theatre. Much of their lives are based in London. Other than being the MP how much of Djanogly's life is based in the Huntingdon constituency? Not much!

Is Djanogly a hard working MP? - Depends on what you mean by hard working! During much of the time he has been representing Huntingdon he was a working partner in SJ Berwin LLP. So much so that he was on the electoral roll for this firm in the City of London. Jonathan was a director on his wife's firm Canalside Studios Management Ltd based in Finchley, North London. Obviously, Jonathan is hard working. When it comes to Parliamentary/Constituency business much is undertaken by staff employed through Parliamentary Allowances in both Parliament and the Constituency. Djanogly also has an intern and has had solicitors seconded from SJ Berwin LLP. So much of the Parliamentary day-to-day business is completed by his staff. 

What got my ire? - Normally, I would be voting for Djanogly. But his attitude to his expenses claims and the  electors ability to hold him to account changed my voting intention. When Djanogly was caught out, his leader was urging his MPs to hold a public meeting. This Djanogly didn't do. Instead Djanogly held a meeting of the Conservative Association which wasn't open to the public

The problem is the modern politician is expected to have the facade of being LOCAL. In Djanogly's case this facade hides a good family life in London.

What to do? - This is a defining election for Djanogly. When Djanogly wins the election on 6th May 2010 he will wipe the slate clean of his expenses scandal. The reason is the people have spoken and have re-elected him with the full knowledge of these claims and his actions afterwards. As a convention this has to be respected and I will. What I will do until the close of polls on 6th May is show up what I feel is wrong with having Djanogly as our MP and find an alternative to Djanogly.

The General Election will pass the Huntingdon Constituency by. The only real question for this constituency is:
Do you want Djanogly to represent this constituency? If the answer is YES, then vote for Djanogly. If the answer is NO then vote for an opponent. Originally I was voting UKIP.
But having seen Jonathan Salt's website I might change my mind!

Jonathan Salt - Independent Candidate

I found the best political website in Huntingdon so far. I have to say it is better than Djanogly's. I hope the Jonathan Salt website is the start of a good campaign by this Independent candidate.

Lets see how this goes. If Jonathan Salt puts up a decent campaign I might swap from UKIP to Jonathan Salt.
I thought I would have a say on the car parking charges. I went to the HDC webpage to try and make my comments. I found this page.
I tried to download the Car Parking consultation documents. I got this message:
So I can't read these documents. Not a very good consultation. I then looked to see if everything else works and I tried the e-mail link. I got this message:
So once again this council FAILS on this website.


The General Election starts!

I see the General Election in Huntingdon is off to a flying start. Well NOT really. Whilst other areas have already started campaigning, like Grant Shapps,
here in Huntingdon the General Election is sedate. Djanogly is congratulating St Ives on 900 years.
So how the main contender doing?
The Liberal Democrats
No change here then!

Parish Boundary Review - How the St Neots Conservatives messed up.

It is easy to believe the Conservative Councillors that this review was something dreamt up by the Boundary Commission. In fact the review of Parish/Town Council arrangements fall squarely on the Conservative controlled HDC.

It came across to me very clearly that our St Neots Conservative Councillors Group were absent in the formulation of these boundary changes. I couldn't find one representation from the Conservatives to this review. The whole lot went through with only a murmur and that was from EHPC. 

So when the Conservatives complain about the hard up people of the annexed areas, they should stand up and inform those residents what they did. Because I can find nothing. The Elections Panel actually was chaired by D. Harty and A. Gilbert was made Vice Chairman during this process. The recommendations were approved by Council, of which all the Conservative District Councillors, at the time, were members.

Instead of standing up and informing the residents as to why they think this is a good idea, now the consequences are becoming apparent they hide or blame the Liberal Democrats. All very easy. Below, I've mapped out how this decision was made. 

This was a Conservative decision. There is no getting away from that.

The original decision was taken in March 2006. - No paperwork on that. The Elections Panel was charged with the job of looking at the boundaries and electoral arrangements.

Elections Panel 22nd August 2006
This sets out the reason behind the review (in legislation) and what the review could do.

This shows the Liberal Democrats were in the running. The "St Neots Conservative Councillors were nowhere!

The St Neots Conservative Councillors at this meeting were: D Harty, A Gilbert
Elections Panel 2nd October 2006
This set out the draft proposals for the new St Neots boundary.

Annex A - Electoral proposals

SNCCG - D. Harty and A. Gilbert
Elections Panel 19th February 2007
Elections Panel Meeting 19/02/07 Appendix
This appendix is a summary of suggestions from the Public. Not one was received from St Neots.

SNCCG - D. Harty. A Gilbert -apologies
Elections Panel 20th November 2007
This was the agreement for the changes to the St Neots Boundary.
SNCCG - D. Harty and A. Gilbert
This set out the final version to go to Council
This a summary of the last representations.
Council Meeting 5th December 2007
This approved the new boundary!
Elections Panel 25th March 2009
Election Panel Minutes 25/03/09
Awaiting details of the confirmation



Huntingdonshire District Council - Parish Boundaries
Link to webpage

Oneleisure likely to go down the trust route.

I got into a bit of a spat with Tim C over on St Neots Community Forum on whether the HDC run Leisure Centres should go into a Leisure Trust. In the recent District Wide propaganda magazine there was a part on the budget problems faced by  HDC. Residents for their ideas. So I sent some in. 

On the subject of putting the Leisure Centres into a Trust I was informed:

"The question of transferring our Leisure Centres to a Trust has been considered in general terms already and may be an area that we go into in depth over the coming months. There are some clear potential benefits but we have an added area of complexity due to the land on which they are located being owned, in a number of cases, by the County Council and Town Councils. Hopefully this will not be insurmountable if the benefits otherwise stack up."


Whilst it is good that HDC is looking at a Leisure Trust, I feel this could be too late. There are undoubted savings to be made by going down this route. The fear is these savings will not be enough to help out the 5 Leisure Centres. HDC may not be able to afford all the Leisure Centres.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Little Paxton has an Annual Parish Meeting. Where is our one?


I see Little Paxton Parish Council (LPPC) is holding their Annual Parish Meeting on 16th April. The St Neots Town Meeting was to be held on election day, 6th May. This has apparently changed. But when is the date?

With LPPC holding the Annual Parish Meeting on a different date to their Annual Council Meeting why does SNTC hold both meetings on the same date?