HCCA Membership

Since Conservatives keep giving different figure for their membership it can be hard to come to a real conclusion on how badly the Conservative under Djanogly are doing. Below are some examples:

Highest was 1436 (2003) to the lowest 686 (2009) is a loss of 750.
2001 figures was 888 to the 2009 figures was 686. So a loss of 202.
Including unpaid members 1,544 (2008) to 778 (2009). This is a loss of 766 members in just one year!

snrednek says: The Conservatives have been caught out with not being consistent with their membership figures. What is obvious is the fall in the Conservative membership at HCCA is large and not being addressed. The Conservatives need to arrest this downward spiral in membership and finances. HCCA has an MP and controls most councils. There must be something turning people becoming members? I feel the answer is Djanogly. Get rid of him and get a proper MP willing to make this constituency his home will change the HCCA.

In the 2009 accounts there is a statement on membership which just doesn't tally with previous figures.

The 2008 figures are:

2008 to 2009.
Full Members -58
Out of Constituency +15
Club -193 (though the figures have changed)
Total -236
Actual Membership -766

The 2007 figures are:

The 2006 figures are:

2006 to 2007. The membership numbers for paid up members is 1021 in 2006 and fell 200 to 821 in 2007.

The 2005 figures are:

2005 to 2006. The overall paid membership rose by 36.

The 2004 figure are: 

2004 to 2005. The figures don't match. The 2004 figures say 933 Full members. In the 2005 figures the 2004 numbers are changed from 933 to 860. The other memberships don't match either!

The 2003 figures are:

The 2003 to 2004 figures don't match.

The 2002 figures are:

The 2002 to 2003 figures don't match.